本页主题: hong kong- chinese humiliation on display 打印 | 加为IE收藏 | 复制链接 | 收藏主题 | 上一主题 | 下一主题

olu
级别: 新手上路


精华: 0
发帖: 27
威望: 37 点
红花: 270 朵
贡献值: 0 点
在线时间:4(小时)
注册时间:2017-01-14
最后登录:2017-07-08

 hong kong- chinese humiliation on display

you dont need to go to a museum to see china's 100yrs of humiliation.

people always talk about how china had 100yrs of humiliation. my question is, did that humiliation stop? yea, sure, it stopped for a few years during the cultural revalution, when china actually had the courage to stand up for itself, but humiliation came back quickly when lin biao died. ever since then, it's been downhill. there have been many examples of humiliation from 71 onward, including when the british had the nerve to negotiate hk's future, as if it werent bad enough that the limeys occupied hk for 100yrs, now they want to dictate what goes on in the city post 97. any self respecting leader would have told britain to fack off, but not deng. what britain should have done was pay reparations for the suffering they caused the chinese people, but dont expect deng, or his successors to ask for it. seeing how weak deng was, britain comes up with a list of demands required for inperialists to project their terorism. needless to say, deng actually agrees to the insane propositions of britain. obviously britain will want to continue to control hk, and use hongers to destabilize the whole of china. if deng, and the revisionists gave a dam about china, theyd tell britain to go to hell, and do the opposite of what britain demanded, but this was not the case.

when hk was "returned" to china, there were no fundamental changes made. hk was still cut off from the mainland. televisions were bombarded by western capitalist programs, and mainland channels were mostly inaccessible. newspapers remained in the hands of inperialists. dengists did pretty much what the brits wanted him to do. they came up with this ludacris idea of one country two systems, which essentially meant that colonialism would continue uninterupted. the west calls hk a "semi autonomous" city, but i dont see how it is semi autonomous, because the west seems to call most of the shots. being controlled by the west isn't my idea of autonomy. if hk was really semi autonomous, why are they adhering to all these western standards?

alot of apologists for inperialism will say, well... it takes time to reintegrate hk. no it doesnt. when kim il sung booted the inperialists out, he transformed his country, and didnt leave any room for japanese inperialism to continue.  likewise, when mao liberated manchuria, he didnt negotiate with tojo on how manchuria should be run. in two years, manchuria was completely integrated back into china. thats how its done, and thats how it should be done, but don't expect deng or his successors to acknowledge that. to them, their priority is to please their american masters. revisionists should go back and restudy that part of history.

any self respecting human being should be thinking how shameful is it for china to voluntarily allow themselves to be colonized. in the past, people had wars to become colonized. today, china chooses to be a colony. that's how pathetic china is. the street names remained, and most of hk's streets are named after inperialists who terorized the chinese people. isn't it strange how the revisionists like to paint japanese inperialists in such a bad light, yet it seems like theres a shortage of shows, and movies that give us an idea of the savagry that the british, and europeans inflicted on the chinese. so what does that say about the revisionists in china if they continue to honor some of the worst criminals to walk the earth?

their education system remained more or less the same, which obviously includes curiculum that glorifies inperialism, and makes students ashamed to be chinese. that explains why hongers are brain washed. yes, the brits and amerikans are to blame, but remember, the revisionists allowed it. markets remained firmly in the hands of the west, which means that instead of buying chinese brands, hongers would be buying foreign brands. one solid example is the use of nike, adidas, new balance, and puma. hongers more or less exclusively use these kinds of brands, while boycotting chinese brands such as anta; lining; qiaodan; xtep; and 361. there probably arent even any chinese sneaker stores in hk. it's absolutely ridiculous that hongers are using european, and american hot water heaters, and washing machines when there are perfectly fine chinese equivalents. we shouldnt overlook markets, because markets give money to inperialists that fuel the opresion going on not only in hk, but throughout the world. without the hk, and tw markets, inperialism would be significantly weakened, and the people have a chance at reclaiming their lives. this is what i mean when i say chinese are digging their own graves. they feed the inperialist machine by buying western products (and products from lackeys such as south korea, japan, singapore), and in return, the inperialists carry out teror, and destabilization against china using china's own money, continuing a vicious cycle. this situation looks worse than the opium war.

does this remind you of the republican era? over 70% of hk's judges are foreigners, more specifically inperialists. that's right, they're brits, australians, you name it. the worst that the world has to offer. none of these judges have chinese citizenship. they hold far right positions. none of them can speak chinese. just the fact that theyre inperialists should disqualify them, and ban them from the city, but no. not only are they in hk pushing inperialist agendas, they're also being paid by the blood, sweat, and tears of the chinese working man. no one with any links to inperialism ought to be a judge anywhere.

what's also disturbing is the continued use of english as an "official language" in the city of hong kong. why should english be used as an official language? by doing this, it just gives inperialists an upper hand. no self respecting chinese leader would allow this. chinese should be the only language if hk reverts back to china, and written chinese should be in simplified, and nothing else. it's an insult to chinese civilization to allow the usage of english as an official language. by removing english it also automatically removes alot of unwanted elements, and personas non gratas. however, by giving english official status, it helps the west promote their racism, and disgusting propaganda. the west makes it as difficult as possible for disidents, and china should do the same. we should all remember how the white man did the native american, and how the white man does the puerto rican in present day.

thats how pathetic 1 country 2 systems is. then theres websites. hongers almost exclusively use foreign sites, specifically american. for example, instead of baidu, they use google. instead of weibo, they use twitter. you get the idea. this means that the information hongers have access to are firmly in the hands of their western colonial masters. they see the world, and china through the lenses of their inperialists. hk is easy access to westerners. most western countries have visa free access into hk, meaning they dont have to apply for visas, while you have to get a visa to enter the mainland. what's even more ridiculous is that chinese people need visas to enter hk, while criminals who brought china to its knees can walk in and out of hk. that law in it of itself should show the mental illness of the revisionists. if a frenchman can walk into german whenever he wants, why cant a mainlander walk into hk without a visa? everything hk does seems to be done to make life easier for inperialists. after 20yrs, hongers are also unable to speak mandarin properly. it can be said that people who werent originally chinese such as tibetans from western china, and koreans from jilin can speak better much better mandarin than hongers. in fact, im trying to decide whether uigers or hongers speaks mandarin worse. 1 country 2 systems has failed miserably at intergrating hongers into china. their sympathies lie more with japan than china. today, hongers are some of the most anti chinese people around, next to the taiwanese. clearly, either the dengists have no idea what theyre doing, or are purposely trying to ruin china. i mean what kind of an idiot would sign up for something like "1 country, 2 systems"? it's the worst possible deal that i can think of. and we're supposed to believe that china is getting stronger? any strong country would do 1 country 1 system, just like the chinese did when they liberated manchuria. mao would have never accepted 50yrs for the japanese to do whatever the hell they wanted in the northeast. that would be an embarasment. if china was getting stronger as the revisionists claim, then why does china first have to gain approval from the west before they do anything on their own soil? it seems to me that china is not only not getting stronger, but getting weaker. as late as 76, china was fairly autonomous. so why is it that 40yrs later, china has to seek approval from the west before making any decisions regarding hk? yes, it was great that china built an island in the south china sea, but would trump ever seek china's approval on what he wants to do with hawaii? would teresa may ever hestitate to do something in scotland because it may offend china? of course not. only a revisionist would give a dam what britain and america think.
any moron can figure out 1 country 2 systems is destined for failure, just like the ussr. it seems like a losing situation for china. you got inperialists doing whatever the hell they want in hk, and the hongers are just fomenting anti chinese activities just like the estonians, and latvians from the ussr were stiring up trouble back in 89. occupy central lasted an entire year, and the cops were even afraid to act. this act alone should be a reminder of the ussr. it's rather unfortunate what has hapened to china, because instead of doing whats right, before they do anything, they seem to first have to think about how their american master would respond, and thats exactly where china has failed. china has gone from hero to zero. it's a sharp contrast to glory days of 67, when the chinese took no nonsense from the west, and if you tried to destabilize china, youd be straightened out by one of the many millions of patriotic militia throughout mainland china at the time.

one of the most obvious examples of china's failure is how hongers were rioting for china, against britain in 67 under the glorious leadership of the cultural revalution, and it was only under that kind of direction that you could get reactionaries to do the right thing for once. if the culutral revalution was able to straighten out clowns like leung, then it just goes to show how brilliant the cultural revalution was indeed. what is unsurprising is that some of those rioters who rioted against britain in 67 are rioting against china now! one high profile case is "long hair" aka Leung Kwok-hung. he has talked about his participation in the 67 riots in hk. however, today, he is rioting against the chinese and is at the forefront of the pro western, pro inperialist movement. in just a few years, he went from being a revalutionary with a cause to becoming a stooge for inperialism. how did that happen? either china got weak all of sudden, or the west became really strong. while the west continued the counterevalution, china stopped the revalution, and joined the counterevalution. today's china has nothing to influence, or inspire the masses like it did in 67. meanwhile the west has been relentless in the way it promotes its reactionary far right ideology. so it should be no surprise that people who might have been good have turned towards evil. this is the price we pay for surrendering the revalution. if nothing else, this should be a reminder of how revisionism is a failure, and how revalution was the way to go.

a country should not do what they think would please america, instead, it must do what is best for the people of their own country. that's the premise for a sovereign country. china's job should never ever be, and cannot be to protect the "investments" of foreign parasites (which seems like their primary goal these days), it's job is to serve the people, and china has forgotten that. these lunatics in beijing are bragging about how great hk turned out because of the large number of french who have moved to hk. these madmen seem to believe that having inperialists leech off of you is an achievement or an accomplishment, but it isn't. not in a million years. this is why no one respects china anymore. they value themselves based on how much they have done for their colonial masters. no one is going to respect that. this is why china has lost its influence in the world, and continues to rely on buying friends. if everyone is walking around in lining's and using baidu instead of google, then perhaps people might start respecting china, but until then, it is unlikely. heck, even if china had the balls to boot out the british, and their nepalese henchmen after 97, people would have respected china for that. the information is out there for anyone to study. the reason why people like gadafi, kim il sung, and mao were so popular was because they did things that were popular, not because they conformed to western expectations.

the only thing china's done right in the past 20yrs is to question the "sino-british joint declaration", but that's not enough. the chinese need to step up and publicly denounce the declaration. this declaration is as humiliating as the unequal treaties, and to accept such a declaration shows china's weakness and incompetence.

theres no point negotiating with, or compromising with the west, because no matter what you do, it wont be enough. ive used the examples of kruschev, and then gorbachev to note the compromises that the ussr made with america, and in the end, america still chose to destroy the ussr. so what we can conclude is that you might as well do whats best for your own country, and not worry about what america thinks, because no matter what, america will destroy you. this is why the global peoples war was so important, because it gave us a bargaining chip, and levels the playing field. by surrendering the global peoples war, this gave america a huge advantage, because they never surrendered their global corporate war. there's no point in playing games here. if you want the west to stop meddling in tw, and hk, then the only thing you can do is to meddle in northern ireland; scotland; quebec; palestine; gibraltar; basque; malvinas; guam; puerto rico; ryuku; and wherever else. they know no limits, and neither should you.

continuing this 1 country 2 systems spectacle will only lead to hongers being further radicalized by their british, and american masters, especially in a day and age where youngsters values are shaped by the internet, and media. by accepting 1 country 2 systems, china is creating problems for itself, and come 2047, it will be much harder to integrate hongers into china than it was in 97. since china doesnt have effective prapaganda, the next best thing to do is to ban religion; western websites such as gugle, yutub, facebok; remove english as an official language; ban newspapers linked to reactionaries (ie apple news, south china morning post); discourage traditional chinese, and cantonese; ban foreign judges and other inperialists from entry; introduce free movement between guangdong, and hk; and make all mainland tv chanels accessible to hongers. if the west doesnt want any trouble, then they can keep their mout shut, but if subsequently, the west has any complaints via their corporate media, then the revalution must be brought to their doorstep again, just as lin biao did 50yrs ago. the opresed black, native, and hispanic populations in america have been ignored for far too long.
[ 此帖被olu在2017-07-08 15:10重新编辑 ]
  
  
  

 
 
顶端 Posted: 2017-07-07 22:00 | [楼 主]
帖子浏览记录 版块浏览记录
中国文革研究网 » CR STUDIES
 
 

Total 0.011376(s) query 3, Time now is:07-26 12:50, Gzip enabled
Powered by PHPWind v6.3.2 Certificate © http://wengewang.tk